Hyper is the Man, Jasmin opens him the secret, it's official!

MX353 is:

5mcg androstenone
10mcg P79
10mcg P83
10mcg P86
5mcg TAF
10mcg P102

It's a really simple mix and I don't why MX353 is that much expensive as MX301? Is P102 really so powerful? I don't test it...

I figured it is P96...

nah - not impressed at all.... this is NOT the original formula ... and these numbers aren't new either - Mark already posted them in January:

http://pherotruth.org/Thread-Pherotruth-...92#pid5764

and he has the same impression like me that this is NOT the exact/complete formula

(09-05-2010 5:27 PM)xyz777 Wrote:  nah - not impressed at all.... this is NOT the original formula ... and these numbers aren't new either - Mark already posted them in January:

http://pherotruth.org/Thread-Pherotruth-...92#pid5764

and he has the same impression like me that this is NOT the exact/complete formula

Shit, so old is the message? Why I overlocked this thread? :sorry2:

Have anyone a idea what the REALLY formula is?

Yeah, April and Amy would, oh wait, neither one works for Androtics anymore!

I think you're out of luck in ever actually getting hold of the original formula.

(09-06-2010 10:45 AM)mark-in-dallas Wrote:  Yeah, April and Amy would, oh wait, neither one works for Androtics anymore!

I think you're out of luck in ever actually getting hold of the original formula.

Hey Mark,
Why don't you think this was the original formula? Is it based purely on your experience? Have others confirmed that?

IMO, MX353 and 292 work equally devastatingly well.. ;) I have not noticed a fall off after several different batches. [/align]

(09-06-2010 10:39 PM)giants52000 Wrote:  Hey Mark,
Why don't you think this was the original formula? Is it based purely on your experience? Have others confirmed that?

IMO, MX353 and 292 work equally devastatingly well.. ;) I have not noticed a fall off after several different batches. [/align]

Had the same experience as Mark. I had one of the first batches of MX292 and ALL of them worked really really really well. Got one order of MX292 that was a little subpar and another that was back up to par. ALL of the MX353 bottles I've used were complete duds in comparison to MX292. If MX292 was a perfect 10, the MX353s are like 3s.

Haven't tried one of the new batches they released and probably won't. Like Mark said, the only people who REALLY know the formula are the people who made them and probably MHarris and Jasmin, both of which may not give you a straight answer.

(09-07-2010 1:08 AM)zeph Wrote:  Like Mark said, the only people who REALLY know the formula are the people who made them and probably MHarris and Jasmin, both of which may not give you a straight answer.

Hey Guys! Who is MHarris? Is he lost?

(09-06-2010 10:39 PM)giants52000 Wrote:  Hey Mark,
Why don't you think this was the original formula? Is it based purely on your experience? Have others confirmed that?

I don't think it's the same formula beacuase my first 2 orders were golden, and the next 2 had far rom the same effects. I haven't ordered from them since.

(09-07-2010 7:51 AM)JohnnyHard Wrote:  Hey Guys! Who is MHarris? Is he lost?

MHarris is Michael Harris, the owner of Androtics, and previously the pheromonestore.com.

[QUOTE='mark-in-dallas' pid='13788' dateline='1283862893']

I don't think it's the same formula beacuase my first 2 orders were golden, and the next 2 had far rom the same effects. I haven't ordered from them since.

[QUOTE='JohnnyHard' pid='13787' dateline='1283860262']

A couple of comments/observations/questions....

1) You haven't ordered from Androtics since you had inconsistent results from various batches of MX292? Is that really enough to disregard AD all together? Seems a bit harsh. However, since you started this site, I guess I can understand that you, of all people, will have the most harsh views against AD...

2) About 292 - it's a pherobomb mix of many ingredients to show proof that mones are not BS.. It's not some careful and refined mix. As a result, many people, as I'm sure you know, have reported inconsistent results with it, though which brings my to my next point...

3) I have not experienced inconsistent results. MX292/353 has been awesome for me. Perhaps that is the placebo I am having? Perhaps you having one too?

uhh, crazy. I also did not see that this was postet here!

I am also very sure this is not the MX353 formula.
And I also think this is not the MX292 formula :-(

MX353 and MX292 is VERY different...