(01-12-2010 5:30 AM)Tisha Wrote: Now if your saying your product it just for use for when your already in a sexual situation that is fine.
I am not saying that my product is only for having sex. I never said that. I said this is how they work for me.
(01-12-2010 5:30 AM)Tisha Wrote: However those who have reported are far younger then I, granted I do notice that they report exactly the same information that you have posted your copulins will do.
I have not seen the same reports you have reported on here. The reports that I have read, both here and in my inbox, are varied as to response. Most report dramatic increase in sexual seeking behavior in their partners with wear. I don't don't wear them that way and so, I don't see that with my husband. Most people who have a positive response don't put them on just before sex, like I do. And I've never seen a single report that was "exactly the same information" that I've posted my copulins will do. So, I'm not sure where this is coming from. However, most reports that I have seen have reported the same effect, that of increased sexual seeking behavior in their partners with wear. So they are similar to each other.
(01-12-2010 5:30 AM)Tisha Wrote: Prehaps its placebo and it is something that has to be considered in all pheromone testing, or maybe its the way the copulins makes them feel that changes their behavoir and their partners are responding to the behavoir not the copulins. Actually this is more likely.
This same argument can be said for any pheromone.... does it effect your behavior or does it effect the target. It is the same argument that you used with me because I always got self effects and you don't usually. But I would remind you that most people are effected by pheromones in a tangible way that is not accounted for by the wearers posturing, copulins included.
However, the bolded part of the statement above is what I have a problem with. There is no way for you to determine whether someone is responding because they have an actual physiologic response to the substance, or because they believe they should. To throw weight behind your belief it is placebo is not balanced or unbiased.
I'm not trying to challenge your history of pheromone use, or your experience in testing. We all know it is extensive. What I want to challenge here is your belief that your response carries the weight of truth, and that others' responses, when different from yours, do not. I would argue that your responses in this matter are just different.
(01-12-2010 5:30 AM)Tisha Wrote: Thats something I am careful of in testing and something I was taught over at AD. We look for the effect of the pheromone thats why we would down play self effects. A person behavoir can change the normal outcome of a situation but what I am looking for is the effect that has nothing to do with the self effect and the behavoir modification it causes. That is what determines if its working pheromonally. If its only effecting the person wearing it then its acting hormonally. A pheromone in the all sense of the word is a chemical that triggers a natural response in another member of the same species.
LOL... is that what they taught you over at AD? Let me clear this up, then and inject a little reality into it.
Many people get self effects from the male pheromones. However, none of these steroids ever have hormonal effects, even if you inject them directly into your bloodstream.
A hormonal effect in these substances would be anabolic and would ensure that those "pheromones" were immediately banned by the DEA.
Hormones are blood-borne substances that have metabolic tissue effects. Some hormones are proteins, some are steroids. The hormone receptors are specific to the hormones. They don't have the same shape, composition, or function as the receptors which bind pheromones. Hormones influence protein synthesis within the cell. Pheromones do not.
Pheromones are neurotransmitter influencing substances which either inhibit or enhance neurotransmitter binding or release, or affect the firing rate of nerves.
The two are not alike in any fashion, nor do they interact with one another in the others functional domain.
Copulins are neither steroids, proteins, nor hormones. They do not ever influence metabolic functioning. However, they do influence neurotransmitter release, and firing rate of nerve impulses. This is what makes them pheromonal.
Where things get tricky is with substances like DHEA, which is not a hormone, but which can be converted into a hormone within the body... if it is taken in enough quantity or if it were to be injected. But in itself, used as a pheromone, it is not a hormone and has no hormonal effects. And even injected, not enough is converted to testosterone (which is a hormone) to cause it to be added to the list of controlled and banned substances.
I think what you are actually arguing is that if a substance diffuses and affects a target it is pheromonal and if it doesn't diffuse, but affects the wearer it isn't. I agree. But copulins are so volatile that if you leave a 100% solution on a lab bench it will completely diffuse within a short period of time.
The problem that I face is not do they diffuse or not. Copulins diffuse too rapidly. This is why I like the higher concentration in oil much better. It slows down the diffusion rate and makes them more effective.
Diane