Heh you guys are talking about this like it's a big issue. Women have done much worse things in stringing guys along. It's not very ethical but quite a natural thing to do.

(10-04-2016 6:32 PM)raikahoken Wrote:  Heh you guys are talking about this like it's a big issue. Women have done much worse things in stringing guys along. It's not very ethical but quite a natural thing to do.

So true. Funny in me own head. Not sure how others see it. If it's offensive to ya, then my apologies in advance. But it's true.

But I do believe in karma. The times I've done it to other ladies compared to me being a victim, I don't know if I've outweighed it. But happened to me so many times I lost count.

We finally found a science to counter act it in a win/win way. It's up to each and every individual to use it properly I guess.

(10-04-2016 6:32 PM)raikahoken Wrote:  Heh you guys are talking about this like it's a big issue. Women have done much worse things in stringing guys along. It's not very ethical but quite a natural thing to do.

"An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes blind."

We've got way off the topic of this thread. I'll happily debate the ethics of this in another thread if you would like.

(10-04-2016 2:08 PM)BarefootOxford Wrote:  The difference between this and what TrojanMagician does (and denis is advocating) is that your story had no intent to hook this girl. You handled it by moving on and shutting her down.

TM is deliberately spending more time around her and using 'mones with the intent to increase her depth of feelings for him when he has no attraction and no intent to satisfy the desire he's building in her. I see this as unethical and spoke up. If he chooses to continue, that's his business and I won't keep banging on the ethics drum with him.

....you mean EXACTLY what a high percentage of women try to do to men?

(10-01-2016 11:28 AM)TrojanMagician Wrote:  Hey guys, So we have "IM

-So I am in a suite with 8 other guys in the dorm, and girls visit every so often that are friends of my roomates. This one girl comes once in a while, she's cute but I'm not really attracted to her. I knew she had a crush on me so I decided be a dick and wear 40mcgs of Androstadienone around her. At first I didn't notice anything so I just shrugged it off....but then I noticed she started coming to the room more and more often. I wore the mix when she did and things started to escalate. She would come in my room when she visited, sit on my bed, try to cuddle with me on the couch, and lol she gave me her phone and told me to put my number in.

THE END

Awesome report! Have fun!

(10-05-2016 2:08 PM)Dblr619 Wrote:  ....you mean EXACTLY what a high percentage of women try to do to men?

Your justification is not an argument. It is still bad behavior and unethical to string someone along with no intent of reciprocating.

Just a quick input:

Experimenting with pheromones around girls you have no interest in isn't inherently evil. It's sometimes necessary to learn how they work using test subjects that affords a certain degree of 'scientific detachment', IMO.

And if anybody thinks girls don't consciously 'experiment' with guys they have ZERO romantic interest in, using flirtation, compliments and generally dancing on that thin line which keeps the guy in a literal emotional hell even for YEARS, wondering if she may actually one day reciprocate his feelings, they are incredibly naive.

Girls can be every bit as ruthless as guys (or as a lioness with a full belly playing with her dinner...)

(10-06-2016 12:51 PM)BarefootOxford Wrote:  Your justification is not an argument. It is still bad behavior and unethical to string someone along with no intent of reciprocating.

Good luck with that chivalry shit.
I'm not justifying anything, just playing the game.
I live in the real word and a VERY small percentage of women are hardly more than a warm hole to masturbate in.
Men may be brutal but women are straight up cruel.

@TrojanMagician, what's the update please? Did u expose any other mones on to her? Thanks.

(10-06-2016 1:13 PM)Dblr619 Wrote:  Good luck with that chivalry shit.
I'm not justifying anything, just playing the game.
I live in the real word and a VERY small percentage of women are hardly more than a warm hole to masturbate in.
Men may be brutal but women are straight up cruel.

I understand playing the game, and it's not what I'm talking about. He's not playing the game, he's playing a different game where he's hurting someone's feelings for his amusement.

1. It's not chivalry or white knighting. I apply it universally. If the original poster were gay and using this on a male target, I'd still cry foul. IF the OP were a woman, I'd still cry foul. It's a shitty way for one human being to treat another human being.
2. "They do it to us, so it's OK to do it to them" is a textbook case of justification.
3. Your opinion of them is also not a argument.
4. Moral equivalency is also justification, not an argument.

In reference to DrChocolate's position, we're ALL experimenting with women all the time. Giving a woman a whiff of Panty Scorcher or Instant Crush or DickSuck#9 casually is very different from what I'm talking about. Some girl getting damp panties in a bar isn't the same thing. It's a completely different scenario and not what I'm addressing.

In the original case, the poster stated that he had no interest in a woman who was falling hard for him. He's expressly not interested in her. He's encouraging her and repeatedly wearing Androstadienone around her in an effort to deepen her attraction for him. That is the specific example that I believe to be unethical. He's manipulating her emotions as an amusement, like a cat toying with a trapped mouse. That's his choice. I did my duty, made my case, and it doesn't seem to have swayed him.