1 user browsing this thread: (0 members, and 1 guest).
Thread Rating:
- 0 Votes - 0 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
Toxicology
|
| Author |
Message |
Gone with the Wind
Pheromone Wraith
Joined:
Oct 2009
Sex: Male
Posts:
116
Reputation: 4796
Rep Post
Thanks Given: 10
Thanks received: 28 thanks in 19 posts
|
RE: Toxicology
11-14-2009 11:07 AM
(11-13-2009 10:04 AM)Diane999 Wrote: ...I laugh about that... if it will effect people in a 10-20 foot radius from you... it had better also have effect on the person at ground zero. If it doesn't, it is just hype.
And if the majority of users don't get any self effects, that to me means that the majority of others exposed to those molecules, ipso facto, also won't be effected...
An information-focused model readily explains lack of self effects while effects on others still remain, while a purely pharmaceutical model makes such phenomena difficult to understand, as noted above.
Experiments with vision have been done which show the brain readily filters out constant or not useful stiumlus. For instance, someone can be given tinted goggles, and after a time will no longer perceive the tint. Colors look normal. The brain reinterprets the stimulus and no longer reports or consciously registers the tint. Similar experiments can be done with goggles that invert the visual image. After an adaptation period the brain reinterprets the image and everything seems normal.
I suspect that the lack of self effects in most users applying pheromone products, or the more commonly reported brief self effects which dissappear after repeated use, is due to the brain learning to interpret and disregard the information being fed to it. The person wearing the pheromone product is continually exposed to an unchanging background stimulus providing little useful information, whereas others get brief and intermittent exposures, that provide apparently useful information about the source of the stimulus.
Gone with the Wind
<p align="center">Gate, gate, paragate, parasamgate. Bodhi svaha!</p>
|
|
|
11-14-2009 11:07 AM
|
|
Thanks given by |
|
Diane999
Banned for Violations
Joined:
Aug 2009
Sex: Male
Posts:
580
Thanks Given: 9
Thanks received: 119 thanks in 76 posts
Posts=648, but changed to 0 to remove from top posters list
|
RE: Toxicology
11-14-2009 11:31 AM
(11-14-2009 11:07 AM)Gone with the Wind Wrote: An information-focused model readily explains lack of self effects while effects on others still remain, while a purely pharmaceutical model makes such phenomena difficult to understand, as noted above.
Experiments with vision have been done which show the brain readily filters out constant or not useful stiumlus. For instance, someone can be given tinted goggles, and after a time will no longer perceive the tint. Colors look normal. The brain reinterprets the stimulus and no longer reports or consciously registers the tint. Similar experiments can be done with goggles that invert the visual image. After an adaptation period the brain reinterprets the image and everything seems normal.
I suspect that the lack of self effects in most users applying pheromone products, or the more commonly reported brief self effects which dissappear after repeated use, is due to the brain learning to interpret and disregard the information being fed to it. The person wearing the pheromone product is continually exposed to an unchanging background stimulus providing little useful information, whereas others get brief and intermittent exposures, that provide apparently useful information about the source of the stimulus.
Both visual and pheromonal changes can also be explained physiologically. Adaptation, including rapid adaptation, is a well known phenomena. But both of these are a change from the ground state.
Pheromonally, that means you responded at one time to it... and then the response lessened and stopped.
But in adaptation, even visually, when you stop the stimulus for long enough for the ground state to re-establish itself, the effects are fresh again to the stimulus. The same holds true for pheromones.
When I talk about lack of effects, I'm talking about zero effects from spray one on... not adaptation.
Diane
|
|
|
11-14-2009 11:31 AM
|
|
Thanks given by |
|
Share This Thread