Almost a decade ago, and a sample size of 1, but I'm curious why the female subject preferred aftershave and sweat to pheromones? Doesn't seem like a biased video. I don't know. Now I'm growing skeptical again...

(10-17-2017 6:04 PM)LogicWoman Wrote:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSZajwsq1mM

Almost a decade ago, and a sample size of 1, but I'm curious why the female subject preferred aftershave and sweat to pheromones? Doesn't seem like a biased video. I don't know. Now I'm growing skeptical again...

hmm, likely because the crazy amount of sprays? Not much info to go by such as dosages or anything. Imagine spraying yourself with 15 sprays of Evolve or SOB, you likely wouldn't get very positive results.. More doesn't always = better

I got a msg saying this video is not available!!

(10-17-2017 6:04 PM)LogicWoman Wrote:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSZajwsq1mM

Almost a decade ago, and a sample size of 1, but I'm curious why the female subject preferred aftershave and sweat to pheromones? Doesn't seem like a biased video. I don't know. Now I'm growing skeptical again...

10 year old experiment and a sample size of 1 and that's all it takes for u to be skeptical ??

I would hope all the posts and testing that members on this site have done over the last 10 years would hold more weight than a 10 year old youtube video with a sample size of 1.

Where was she in her cycle? That can effect responses. If a sample size of 1 makes you skeptical then return your pheromones and stop experimenting.

That's ok.

sample size of 1 makes me skeptical because her aversion to the pheromone was so strong. also, aren't reponse to pheromones more or less universal for a gender?

(10-17-2017 9:08 PM)LogicWoman Wrote:  sample size of 1 makes me skeptical because her aversion to the pheromone was so strong. also, aren't reponse to pheromones more or less universal for a gender?

I really hate sushi ... does that mean sushi is garbage and no one else should eat it?

some people are not affected by mones ... that's all there is to it. some people get selfies, some don't. nothing is universal ... there are always exceptions to any rule. you being LogicWoman should realize this.

(10-18-2017 12:02 AM)Spider-mone Wrote:  some people are not affected by mones .

being not "affected" by mones, something advertised to ATTRACT, is very different from being completely repulsed by them.

Fish/food is not a good example. If sushi were advertised to be sexually attractive, something deeply ingrained into the most primal parts of our brains, then yeah, and yes sushi would be garbage if it didn't only fail to attract but greatly repulsed people. BTW, I went vegan after watching the videos on nutritionfacts.org and yes, yes fish is a nutritional garbage and its scent is universally unpleasant, to say the least. People who hate fish will be repulsed by fish in larger magnitudes that those who dislike produce, so even outliers who have negative reactions indicate clues that something might be "garbage".

Also, another reason is that I haven't seen mones in action. All i've had is hearsay and what pheromones I have used didn't really do much, if anything at all. Had i witness mones doing something for me, I wouldn't grow skeptical so fast.

(10-17-2017 6:29 PM)Spider-mone Wrote:  I would hope all the posts and testing that members on this site have done over the last 10 years would hold more weight than a 10 year old youtube video with a sample size of 1.

could be placebo effect, for all I know. i need to test for myself but my supplies are taking forever to arrive, but even I could suffer from the placebo effect.

A more balanced dose of mones in sweat is my guess. Syntethics give off non-human levels of mones frequently. Could be a bad blend "Sex shop pheromone spray main ingredient is androstenol". The sweaty man was very physically attractive.