(05-05-2017 5:10 PM)ShadowX114 Wrote:  Let's guess

I forgot his name but is it the subliminal-shop person? Catman was it?
or Laid Brand; since they don't offer "traditional" products.

(05-05-2017 6:13 PM)DarkLord1 Wrote:  .

This thing of ours won't be the same.

(05-06-2017 1:49 AM)kalpan56 Wrote:  Lol........ It should be interesting conversation. Pheromones are main stream for years. LAL is selling it on amazon. If you are going to say about mass adoption. Nope. I am pessimistic about it. People expect pheromones as AXE effect. It is not magic. Thus, people will be disappointed.

Only few people will be interested. The term is coined for years and ridiculed for years. I don't think main stream perfume industry will work on this. They will ridicule it to keep their products to be safe.

There would be surge for few days and then all settle down. People in general don't care about being like or progress. They only want to get things on silver platter without efforts.

No politician will ban pheromone either. There is no proven harm in the society due to pheromones. I have not seen a single report of use of pheromones harming anyone. It is also costly to use pheromones. Thus, masses will be far away.

(05-09-2017 9:38 AM)Paradox Wrote:  https://laidbrand.com/laid-brand-appear-abcs-shark-tank/

The show was probably taped a few months ago.

It's a good look (no pun) for Brad and Laid Brand. I wish them well. I remember testing/trying several Laid Brand products about five years ago.

(05-09-2017 12:24 PM)mark-in-dallas Wrote:  You mean Adam, Brad is with Hax.

I think it was back in September or maybe October that Adam told me he was going to be on Shark Tank, but asked me not to say anything at the time.

(05-09-2017 1:10 PM)Arsenic Wrote:  Oh alright - upon looking at the product descriptions I see that they only have products available for women. Shit, guys we're in trouble! Stay away from the hair!

(05-09-2017 1:29 PM)Spider-mone Wrote:  that must be why I love the smell of women's hair!!! lol

(05-09-2017 1:10 PM)Arsenic Wrote:  Oh alright - upon looking at the product descriptions I see that they only have products available for women. Shit, guys we're in trouble! Stay away from the hair!

(05-09-2017 6:12 PM)heey85 Wrote:  when this gets aired... could we somehow shut down this website until the BS hype ends...

(05-09-2017 6:45 PM)Arsenic Wrote:  I don't like the idea of others using it. Cause I'm selfish and like an edge

(05-09-2017 7:07 PM)heey85 Wrote:  Amen to that... I introduced a few friends to it but they didn't find much interest in it, I think the idea Died out with them (hopefully) whatever... it's all MEMEMEMEMEME. or at least us... I know it sounds bad to say that it doesn't work out with shark tank from the point of view of Laid, but damnitZ!

(05-09-2017 7:28 PM)BigDickBandit420 Wrote:  Yes, all my friends who I've introduced have not been very interested or curious, even when I'm giving it to them for free. It's become a hobby for zero or the 10 (off the top of my head) guys who I've given some too.

(05-09-2017 7:32 PM)Arsenic Wrote:  Are we the weird ones then?

Ever since I saw Max Keeble's Big Move when I was a kid I became interested in pheromones. The scene where the hot professor openes a bottle of pheromones and all the boys go crazy. It just made sense to me.

(05-10-2017 8:38 AM)Spars Wrote:  For me, episodes of Shark Tank like this one can invariably lead to the "rabbit hole" effect. Dude sees the commercial and looks into other products, starting with Google and finds our little alcove of the internet. He's a chemist by trade and starts making products on his own after sampling the competition at our unbeknownst guidance. Figured he can do it better but he's a wannabe "shark" and figures it's a virtually untapped market. Gouges is with fake claims and great advertisiing. Product goes main stream. Used chemicals not properly sourced or researched. Someone gets cancer. Sues him. Here come the regulations.

Anyone who has seen the show knows that any Tom, Dick, or Harry who goes on the show, regardless of whatever deal they make, if there is a market that watches, they find each other and the show bumps sales. Sometimes hugely. Im worried about the 1% looking to make it big. That could cause quite a change, almost overnight.

(05-10-2017 8:38 AM)Spars Wrote:  For me, episodes of Shark Tank like this one can invariably lead to the "rabbit hole" effect. Dude sees the commercial and looks into other products, starting with Google and finds our little alcove of the internet. He's a chemist by trade and starts making products on his own after sampling the competition at our unbeknownst guidance. Figured he can do it better but he's a wannabe "shark" and figures it's a virtually untapped market. Gouges is with fake claims and great advertisiing. Product goes main stream. Used chemicals not properly sourced or researched. Someone gets cancer. Sues him. Here come the regulations.

(05-10-2017 9:44 AM)Spars Wrote:  I doubt so, too. It's a long shot, as you point out. Mr Mark also has a valid point. I feel that main stream media is more influential, now more then ever. Google makes many things too easy to "research" and I feel like I've pulled a few threads over the last three years to lead me down many rabbit holes. Im no different than any other channel surfer, in a lot of ways. I could totally see myself headed down that hole from an episode of shark tank. My intentions are different and I'm no chemist looking to strike gold, but that doesn't mean they aren't out there.

If anybody hears the word pheromones following this episode in your day to day, report it here. Sound good?

(05-10-2017 9:58 AM)Paradox Wrote:  I almost forgot the most recent reference to Pheromones in the media...Gotham! Gotham averages 3.3 million viewers per week. Poison Ivy's shtick is to use pheromones to influence people. Poison Ivy is in 12 episodes of Gotham and uses her pheromone perfume often on the show.

(05-10-2017 10:48 AM)BarefootOxford Wrote:  ...That is why I am somewhat concerned about legislation, now.

(05-09-2017 9:38 AM)Paradox Wrote:  The Sharks generally don't like backing products that do not have solid science/research to back them up.

They also generally also don't like products that are not patented or can be easily copied.

(05-12-2017 7:49 PM)Paradox Wrote:  They thought out their approach but the concept of pheromones is seen as hokum by the public.

(05-12-2017 7:49 PM)Paradox Wrote:  Did derrick say there was a whole pheromone community? The first rule of Fight Club is....

The reaction was from the Sharks was "Really? There is a whole community?"

I think we are safe.

Sorry though that Laid Brand did not get the deal.

(05-12-2017 8:35 PM)DarkLord1 Wrote:  There is winning a battle and losing a war.....if memory serves me right, some countries already ban some pheromones.

(05-12-2017 8:35 PM)DarkLord1 Wrote:  There is winning a battle and losing a war.....if memory serves me right, some countries already ban some pheromones.

(05-13-2017 8:03 AM)Paradox Wrote:  This is not a true statement. There are no countries that ban pheromones. #badmemory

(05-13-2017 8:13 AM)DarkLord1 Wrote:  A better way is to ask for clarification instead of what was done.

(05-13-2017 8:13 AM)DarkLord1 Wrote:  So you are saying that no state or country has banned an individual pheromone by labeling it a steroid?

That some products domt make it through customs in some countries because of their ingredients?

Maybe you assumed that I meant that a country banned all pheromones out right.

A better way is to ask for clarification instead of what was done.

(05-13-2017 8:13 AM)DarkLord1 Wrote:  So you are saying that no state or country has banned an individual pheromone by labeling it a steroid?

That some products domt make it through customs in some countries because of their ingredients?

Maybe you assumed that I meant that a country banned all pheromones out right.

A better way is to ask for clarification instead of what was done.

(05-13-2017 9:11 AM)jb20 Wrote:  One of the mones was banned because smelling it gives opioid like effects on brain(was on Canada's banned list);no vendor has ever used this so we are safe.

(05-13-2017 9:27 AM)Paradox Wrote:  Show proof. What is this banned substance. Name it and show proof that it was banned because smelling it gives opioid like effects on brain.

Again, this is however off topic as is much of the discussion about pheromones getting banned or legislated on this thread.

If anyone needs to discuss the topic of pheromones and legislation at length just start a separate thread.

(05-13-2017 9:37 AM)jb20 Wrote:  Check pm and then check canada's banned substance list. Better not to share it.
Offtopic: This topic is like shooting yourself in the foot(not beneficial to the community) and will bring all the people searching for s.tank here. Better to get rid of this.
0.02

(05-13-2017 10:17 AM)BigDickBandit420 Wrote:  Be mindful that what we type becomes keywords that make the website discoverable in search engines. Don't create keyword for search engines to pick up and people to find this website through that keywords mental frame.

(05-13-2017 10:45 AM)Paradox Wrote:  Every time someone types the word "Pheromone" it makes the site more discoverable. So stop typing the word Pheromone. I know that this is a Pheromone forum but using the word Pheromone is triggering search engines to send Pheromone traffic to this Pheromone community.

(05-13-2017 10:51 AM)BigDickBandit420 Wrote:  I'm talking about the L word

(05-13-2017 3:44 PM)heey85 Wrote:  @paradox... lol are you playing with bandit?

(05-13-2017 10:17 AM)BigDickBandit420 Wrote:  Be mindful that what we type becomes keywords that make the website discoverable in search engines. Don't create keyword for search engines to pick up and people to find this website through that keywords mental frame.

(05-13-2017 6:16 PM)BigDickBandit420 Wrote:  No, I meant lxxxxxxxxxx which is the second to last word of post 39. If you search for "pheromone lxxxxxxxxx" on google currently it shows some pheromones being sprayed down from an airplane as pesticides for plant production.

(05-17-2017 10:10 AM)Pheroman Wrote:  What a terrible presentation. And yes the name is too corny.
Came across to me as they dont know much about business or the product.
They should have hired, or at least tried to hire JV Khol to do a quick presentation instead of the girl who was there for no reason.

(05-18-2017 6:16 AM)Paradox Wrote:  I've never seen an expert brought in to explain the science behind some of the ideas presented on the show. Usually one of the presenters will be boned up on the science and the other will take the numbers (sales, markets, projected growth).

Barbara Corcoran said right away that the formula did not affect Kevin O'Leary. She expected what has been portrayed on TV and movies about pheromones...immediate hypnotic love like state from the target.

Mark Cuban did not take it seriously at all. In his mind pheromones are nonsense. He giggled through the beginning of the presentation.

Kevin was out for several reasons. They couldn't prove to him that the product was unique. They also couldn't prove that there was a market for the product.

Lori and Robert just seemed to be uninterested.

(05-23-2017 12:26 AM)ppHamelin Wrote:  Stoked the public for sure:
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%2012-m&geo=US&q=laid%20brand

(05-18-2017 6:16 AM)Paradox Wrote:  Mark Cuban did not take it seriously at all. In his mind pheromones are nonsense. He giggled through the beginning of the presentation.

(05-23-2017 1:47 AM)BigDickBandit420 Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 12:26 AM)ppHamelin Wrote:  Stoked the public for sure:
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%2012-m&geo=US&q=laid%20brand

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%2012-m&geo=US&q=pheromones

Didn't cause much change for the keyword pheromones!

(05-23-2017 7:34 AM)BarefootOxford Wrote:  But it did change the singular, pheromone: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%2012-m&geo=US&q=pheromone