Pheromone Reviews - Real People - Real Reviews
Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - Printable Version

+- Pheromone Reviews - Real People - Real Reviews (http://pherotruth.com)
+-- Forum: Forums (/Forum-Forums)
+--- Forum: Research Forum (/Forum-Research-Forum)
+---- Forum: News on Pheromones (/Forum-News-on-Pheromones)
+---- Thread: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl (/Thread-Bob-Hughes-interviews-James-V-Kohl)


Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - jvkohl - 02-01-2011 5:45 AM

This is from an interview I did last week. It's about 15 minutes long.

http://www.pheromonics.org/content/james-v-kohl-audio-interview

James V. Kohl
scentoferos.com


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - Rolf - 02-01-2011 5:43 PM

I thought this was really interesting....

Thanks James

(disclosure: I'm the interviewer)


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - jvkohl - 02-01-2011 5:49 PM

The interviewer is the person who makes it interesting.

James
http://www.pheromones.com

(02-01-2011 5:43 PM)Rolf Wrote:  I thought this was really interesting....

Thanks James

(disclosure: I'm the interviewer)



RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - Rolf - 02-01-2011 5:52 PM

(02-01-2011 5:49 PM)jvkohl Wrote:  The interviewer is the person who makes it interesting.

James
http://www.pheromones.com


blush


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - m0ses - 02-01-2011 6:09 PM

fantastic interview, really made me think about a few things differently. Also made me want to throw on some Scent of Eros Smile


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - jvkohl - 02-01-2011 8:03 PM

(02-01-2011 6:09 PM)m0ses Wrote:  fantastic interview, really made me think about a few things differently. Also made me want to throw on some Scent of Eros Smile

That's what I hope the science does; help focus on reality. Chemicals in cosmetic products can make us look good, whether they are topically applied as 'make-up' or added to fragrance products that capture the essence of looking good: the hormone metabolism to pheromones that gives us the scent of reproductive fitness.

James V. Kohl
scentoferos.com


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - Fincaboy - 11-14-2011 8:29 AM

(02-01-2011 8:03 PM)jvkohl Wrote:  That's what I hope the science does; help focus on reality. Chemicals in cosmetic products can make us look good, whether they are topically applied as 'make-up' or added to fragrance products that capture the essence of looking good: the hormone metabolism to pheromones that gives us the scent of reproductive fitness.

James V. Kohl
scentoferos.com


Yes terrific video, thanks.....


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - 2Soon2Care - 11-14-2011 8:48 PM

Very good interview James! I love your 1st base on to home run analogy!


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - jvkohl - 11-14-2011 11:03 PM

(11-14-2011 8:48 PM)2Soon2Care Wrote:  Very good interview James! I love your 1st base on to home run analogy!

Thanks. At one point, I think the analogy was part of the Wikipedia entry on pheromones.


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - halo0073 - 11-15-2011 7:42 AM

Terrific interview. I passed it on to one of my friends who is a big fan of yours James.


RE: Bob Hughes interviews James V. Kohl - jvkohl - 11-15-2011 11:37 AM

(11-15-2011 7:42 AM)halo0073 Wrote:  Terrific interview. I passed it on to one of my friends who is a big fan of yours James.

Thanks, it's always nice to hear I have fans. I'm currently doing battle on the evolutionary psychology group with some antagonists who don't understand enough about biology to integrate Science and Creation as I did in my book chapter The Mind's Eyes: Human pheromones, neuroscience, and male sexual preferences

The biggest problem there is the unwillingness to learn anything about what most people here already know about the sense of smell. All of the discussants seem to otherwise be of normal intelligence. But they have no clear concept of the central role that olfactory/pheromonal input plays in the development of behavior.

They would rather argue that color vision is more important to food choice than is the food's chemical appeal. Then they extend that argument to one for color vision being more important to sexual preferences than are chemical cues/social odors/pheromones.

We then discuss non-existent "mental modules" for perception of cues important to individual survival (e.g., nutrition) and species survival (e.g., sexual reproduction) as if olfactory/pheromonal cues could simply be dismissed in humans, because we are so intelligent. The intelligence is not demonstrated by many of the discussants who think visual cues and mental modules are more important to human behavior than are olfactory/pheromonal cues.