Would like to reserve this spot to hear about how the updated/fixed AM is performing for the testers.

Today is your lucky day boys

My two tester bottles of Alpha Maschio from AD have arrived. One is labelled bottle A. One is labelled Bottle B.

Both are scented in L&S as I requested that cover.

No sprayer is included.. I have to measure out some drops.. I'll choose a random # and stick to it. Possibly 2-3 drops.

My testing will not revolve around the performance of L&S as it is independent from the testing of the mones.

AD has not told me which tester bottle contains the enhanced formula.. This is blind testing after all.

After a period of a couple of weeks or when I find one bottle completely decimating the other I will post my conclusion and submit to AD.


Stay tuned Peeps!...

(02-25-2016 12:04 PM)dsouza Wrote:  Today is your lucky day boys

My two tester bottles of Alpha Maschio from AD have arrived. One is labelled bottle A. One is labelled Bottle B.

Both are scented in L&S as I requested that cover.

No sprayer is included.. I have to measure out some drops.. I'll choose a random # and stick to it. Possibly 2-3 drops.

My testing will not revolve around the performance of L&S as it is independent from the testing of the mones.

AD has not told me which tester bottle contains the enhanced formula.. This is blind testing after all.

After a period of a couple of weeks or when I find one bottle completely decimating the other I will post my conclusion and submit to AD.


Stay tuned Peeps!...

Is the "enhanced" formula just the pre-H AM?

Should i buy AM now or is it just the wrong time? I don't quite understand the difference between the old and new.

(02-25-2016 12:12 PM)theLaw Wrote:  Is the "enhanced" formula just the pre-H AM?

I believe so. It is my understanding that AD has adjusted the doses of their current none supplier to approximate or better the original AM pre-H, pre-50 ml.

I'm hesitant to post beta testing results here, as my results could be skewed by forum opinion. I will post my finding as a summary when I have given both testers fair trials.

I will keep a separate personal log as I go along, but I feel if one tester bottle really contains substantial more none than the other the results will be like night and day and it will be pretty obvious the winner.

You are a scholar and a gentleman, Dsouza. Avidly awaiting the results of your testing.

p.s. @ Krish: Yes, I would hold off purchasing either L2K or AM until the results of the testing are in and AD can be sure that they solved all issues related to these two products.

(02-25-2016 12:26 PM)dsouza Wrote:  I believe so. It is my understanding that AD has adjusted the doses of their current none supplier to approximate or better the original AM pre-H, pre-50 ml.

I'm hesitant to post beta testing results here, as my results could be skewed by forum opinion. I will post my finding as a summary when I have given both testers fair trials.

I will keep a separate personal log as I go along, but I feel if one tester bottle really contains substantial more none than the other the results will be like night and day and it will be pretty obvious the winner.

Wow!!!

Only AD could bring out a product upgrade without actually upgrading it........

I appreciate that they are solving this problem, but perhaps it shouldn't have been an issue in the first place (like the Hed debacle).

It would be nice for AD to execute a plan without all the drama.........just once. Love the product line, but they really need to get organized.

I was about to order L2K v1 and AM,

now waiting for the upgrade and your testing results

Does anyone know when AD started selling the ''low none'' AM?

I bought mine October 2015 and I'm not getting much out of it..

Is their value in being a mone horder? Time will tell. Got 3 full bottles of original L2k 1 sitting in my closet.

And some A314 rev 32 and 29. That's oil stock that went up. Ha. Rest is all down.