Just curious to know Kmacc, did you see any self effects and what dosage did you try this out for yourself?

Awesome testing. Thanks guys!

For everybody's infor:
I did 9 drops and by my calculation (correct me if I’m wrong Chris):
90 sprays x 10 mcg = 900
900 ÷ 5 ml = 180
180 ÷ 50 drops (50 drop to 1 ml is my standard calculation ) = 3.6 mcg drops

9 x 3.6 mcg = 32.4 mcg
Once again I must repeat the social value out weight the Gay vibe by a hundred percent. Will I use it again, Try and stop me. Self effect Reminded me of neno, but on a lower scale. First twenty minutes my eyes were playing tricks on me. I asked my girl to drive, for fear of getting stopped by the cops. And we know how much fun that is.

(07-22-2012 3:38 PM)zerosix85 Wrote:  If there are feminizing aspect to D2 at higher dosage, then we really need females and gay testers for this to see if it enhances their image/sexuality. Shelley, I'm looking at you. I sure you're going to love it.

D'oh! Yeah Buddy!!! Rubs hands together with glee! Come on SALE!!! And I have another Phero friend who may give this a whirl who is female - she's tinkering with the idea...

(07-23-2012 7:31 AM)Shelly B Wrote:  D'oh! Yeah Buddy!!! Rubs hands together with glee! Come on SALE!!! And I have another Phero friend who may give this a whirl who is female - she's tinkering with the idea...

I wouldn’t call it a feminizing property; to me it was more of a P-83 thing. The people around me (My Italian friend in particularly) felt more at ease with their core and let it show. I would suspect that there are more than one Bi, Gay or in the closet Gay people at this club. I didn’t draw then like moth to a flame.

I’ve wore a great deal of Pheromone around these people. The reaction I got from my friend and zerosix85 email needs more investigation by the Gay members of this forum.

(07-23-2012 8:23 AM)kmacc45 Wrote:  I wouldn’t call it a feminizing property; to me it was more of a P-83 thing.

Kmacc45 - can you explain what you mean by a P-83 thing? I was never an AD user....

(07-23-2012 9:03 AM)Shelly B Wrote:  Kmacc45 - can you explain what you mean by a P-83 thing? I was never an AD user....

P-83 is a great molecule for LMR. D2 seem to work the same way as in speech and action. In other words, if it's in yet, D2 will bring's it out. A lot more testing needed.

(07-05-2012 2:22 AM)zerosix85 Wrote:  I should of explained myself better and I'm sorry for that. D2 is an amazing molecule but mixing it with attention grabbing molecules wouldn't make for an OD effect.

You know, I don't really get an OD effect from ANY attention grabbing molecules, except maybe for a headache with something like Mol A Round #2. I just don't get additional benefit from more of the molecule.

Which brings me to the question; do attention generating molecules stack, one on top of the other? Or are they just different ways of pushing the same button?

I'm going to test that very soon. Is there a shortened molecule name that we use for this as opposed to D2? I'm no scientist so I can't make the call.

(07-31-2012 5:05 PM)zerosix85 Wrote:  I'm going to test that very soon. Is there a shortened molecule name that we use for this as opposed to D2? I'm no scientist so I can't make the call.

Alpha Pregnadienol