(09-25-2016 8:40 AM)Snoopyace Wrote: So wait... Are you saying that is exactly what they called you or are you paraphrasing? I can't see any customer service rep calling a customer that. If that's not what they said, then what were their exact words?
(08-27-2016 2:32 PM)ScentHound Wrote: Then the guy tells me I was probably just too lazy to pick up my package from the post office and whatever happens once their product leaves their facility isn't their problem.
This is the least credible part when I consider the story shared here. I've worked in phone-based customer-facing roles for a long time. I've worked with excellent agents, and dreadful agents. Even the dreadful ones I've known have never said anything like this. It is exceedingly common among the people I know to escalate to a supervisor when not receiving the service they expect, immediately, and with indignation were they to be insulted on the line.
It's also common for a person to modify a story when retelling what happened, such that they appear to be more positive and less negative, either by embellishing, avoiding parts, or outright lying. So when I consider what's been told versus my experience of the industry, three scenarios come to mind:
First, the agent's reaction is embellished. A junior agent could easily fall into the trap of asking why ScentHound didn't go fetch the package from the post office. Some might interpret that through their own filters as an accusation of laziness or other moral failing to which they are sensitive and defensive.
Second, the agent's reaction is accurate, but ScentHound's preceding actions have been glossed over. It is possible that ScentHound was a dreadful customer, insulting the agent, yelling, angry, and unwilling to be talked out of his tree.
Finally, there is a possibility that LPMP is misstating their own responses to ScentHound, and hiding behind a thin veil of keeping private things private.
The last scenario seems the least probable for several reasons:
* small companies like LPMP know that they depend upon the goodwill of their customers, and generally err on the side of caution and asskissing to avoid negative press such as has been offered by ScentHound.
* ScentHound places all responsibility at the feet of LPMP, accuses the USPS of being famously unreliable, and claims that LPMP are swindlers who make money off of the shipping via USPS. In other words, it is not only everyone else's fault, they're all bad people, too. These types of escalation from "a problem" to swindlers and relatively-ignorant accusations against a foreign mail service are indications that ScentHound is not being completely open in this matter.
The claim of USPS being unreliable is easily believable because we've all had packages or letters delayed, lost, or misdelivered. When you get into international shipping, it becomes more complicated. Postal services need to share and update each other's tracking numbers if those were included as part of the service. Similarly, the customer must look this up on the correct postal service's website (origin or destination), and sometimes, it just doesn't work out. It's also interesting that he says he'd have paid for FedEx or UPS, indicating that he's had trouble receiving packages handed off from USPS to the postal service in his country. LPMP offers these services, but they're not available during checkout. I know this because I saw on their front page that they're using these services to circumvent the Canada Post labor strike. So, if these were all true for my situation, I would have contacted LPMP to place my order on the phone and use a carrier reliable in my country.
I've seen several posts on PheroTruth that the USPS originated shipments have arrived faster and without duties applied to them, contrasting with excessive brokerage fees and duties associated with shipments via FedEx and UPS.
Everything I've written here is supposition, and should not be taken as an accusation against anyone.