Why on Earth do people try to stress testing and personal experience when it seems like the entire purpose of this forum is to learn from other people's mistakes and exchange ideas?

Everyone is unique. Just like one phero can produce a major hit from one woman, it can repel another woman like an old fart. So it is with self-effects and the interactions with personal pheromone signature.

You can also learn quite a bit. For example, I thought that I was looking for sexual blends because I wanted attraction, but now I find that I want social/status blends. I get more attraction and status that way, more bonding, and more action.

The purpose of placing emphasis on personal testing and experience is because a particular mone product may work differently for you than it does for someone else.

Case in point - let's use the combo THA-HUG as an example.

Snoopyace's and my dosage of THA-HUG is 2 sprays THU and 2 drops GOA.

MMM's standalone dosages of THU and GOA respectively are 2 sprays and 3 drops. Would those numbers work for him straight up as THA-HUG or would he have to cut back GOA by one drop like Snoopyace and me?

No one knows unless MMM tests and experiences it for himself.

The purpose of this forum is indeed "to learn from other people's mistakes and exchange ideas" and discuss all and every product in an uncensored environment. HOWEVER, you would not learn as much by only reading other people's experience rather than testing by yourself and checking what works for YOU.

I'm gonna quote triple M here

(07-21-2015 9:18 AM)MMM Wrote:  And REMEMBER PEOPLE: Just because the MONE PROS tell you something DOES NOT WORK, doesn't mean there are NOT EXCEPTIONS out there! This planet is full of EXCEPTIONS to just about anything we can say or think. Just saying.

M.

I think the replies pretty much nailed it. The new phenomenon is noobs with virtually no experience recommending combos. By relying on other people you risk missing a product that might work better for you.

Pheromones are a very dependent upon the situation and subject. My actual results are different than what other people report because my personality, actions, situation, age, and subjects are completely different.
Now based on recommendations I have a good idea what products to try and what the general outcome should be if it works, but no one can tell you how it'll work for you in your situations. Also, pheromones seem to enhance your personality and actions. Everyone's does things differently and the pheromones are going to work differently for each person.

For example a nice guy isn't going to necessarily get an alpha hit by wearing alpha mones if he's not behaving somewhat alpha to a audience of receptive women. It may work for you on different women in different ways for your personality type.

Naaa we aint all that different.
Ive heard the exact same words from many different girls over many years.
Subtleties may be different, but generally most people are similar and fall in a few categories.
Yeah yeah everybody likes to think they are a special snowflake (btw this is chick logic), but if it was the case it wouldnt be the highest paid jobs in the marketing dept. There would be no marketing depts.

As for the forum, well thats why i like to use journals as the best source of info, and there is some history to the writers method/character traits etc.

^That's where the problem starts.

To assume that we are all similar to the extent that a specific mone product that works for someone at a specific dosage should do the same for someone else at that same dosage is, frankly, fallacious.

True, people can be grouped into a few categories and would be able to exhibit similar traits to one another within each category.... BUT... the operative word here is "similar." Not "same."

Others' experiences are valuable in that they can be used as signposts as to where to start, what to look out for, etc., but the minutiae in testing comes down to the individual wearing the product.

How many stories have we heard on the forum where someone reads reports, goes out and buys a product and rushes into things without methodically testing, only to come back on the forum some time later to complain the product is a dud when other regular users know otherwise?

Likewise, there are also reports where a person goes and buys a mone product, tests methodically and after some time concludes that the product either works for them at a specific dose, or not at all.

There are just too many variables to consider - age, stature, body chemistry, character, locale, demographic and psychographic, etc. This is why individual testing is emphasized so much on the forum. The only way one would know how much works for him or her, or whether that product works at all, is to TEST TEST TEST.

As moe aptly put it:

(07-21-2015 6:28 PM)moe Wrote:  The purpose of this forum is indeed "to learn from other people's mistakes and exchange ideas" and discuss all and every product in an uncensored environment. HOWEVER, you would not learn as much by only reading other people's experience rather than testing by yourself and checking what works for YOU.
...

If someone handed you a case of beer would you immediately chug all 24 beers down in a row? Or would you enjoy the differences between being buzzed, drunk and passed out? I'll bet you know how many drinks it takes you to get to a happy drunk from past experience. Same thing.

Unfortunately for our wallets real world testing means real world spending