1 user browsing this thread: (0 members, and 1 guest).
Thread Rating:
- 0 Votes - 0 Average
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
|
AM NOS 2017 Reviews
|
| Author |
Message |
V-nice
Senior Member
Joined:
Oct 2013
Sex: Male
Posts:
1,099
Reputation: 800
Rep Post
|
RE: AM NOS 2017 Reviews
10-22-2017 7:06 AM
I like AM NOS. To the point where I'll put it in top 5.
It's really good from my use, and you'll definitely see responses from the ladies... Definitely! Hasn't failed. Like MAG? Hmmmm
I could probably see where that comes from as I had a moment where this hottie had her radar locked on me (Latina) in a birthday party I went to, Obvious and blatant. Even watching to see if I was with anyone. No turning her head away, no shame, just staring with intent. I realize it wasn't just her, as a much younger chick stole a few glances. These are all openings I witnessed, and was good to see. Tons of compliments from my Bond 9 cover...Overall I'd say a good blend. Good attractant, good at creating attraction.
Women young and old were attentive to me, as well as guys. One of the main reasons I liked MAG was because of Arousal. I mean, that's mostly if not all I really want from a blend to be honest. AM NOS seems to be good at that. NOT as MAG, but good enough to make some noise.
Hits hard, hits fast!
I went down from using 2 to one spray now, as I was also advised, because it does seem to be strong and can be intimidating.
But looks good guys! Decent.
"The man that knows he doesn't know, is a wise man."
|
|
|
10-22-2017 7:06 AM
|
|
DrChocolate
Learner and observer
Joined:
Aug 2016
Sex: Male
Posts:
2,573
Reputation: 898
Rep Post
|
RE: AM NOS 2017 Reviews
10-22-2017 8:06 AM
(10-22-2017 7:06 AM)V-nice Wrote: Hits hard, hits fast!
I went down from using 2 to one spray now, as I was also advised, because it does seem to be strong and can be intimidating.
But looks good guys! Decent.
Ur experiences echo mine . What were ur app points?
Also, did u spray a blob in the app point (meaning NOT smudged) or did ya smudge it.
I feel that there's a difference between the 2. Am still testing but.
|
|
|
10-22-2017 8:06 AM
|
|
RussianWolf
Senior Member
Joined:
Jan 2014
Sex: Male
Posts:
1,019
Reputation: 347
Rep Post
|
RE: AM NOS 2017 Reviews
10-22-2017 11:39 AM
Hold onto your beliefs loosely, and hold onto your truths tightly.
|
|
|
10-22-2017 11:39 AM
|
|
DrChocolate
Learner and observer
Joined:
Aug 2016
Sex: Male
Posts:
2,573
Reputation: 898
Rep Post
|
RE: AM NOS 2017 Reviews
10-23-2017 9:08 AM
(10-23-2017 9:04 AM)DtheGreek Wrote: Am I wrong to think this but isn't AM NOS kind of admitting your new stuff isn't as good as your old stuff?
Just me 2 cents.
I don't thinks it's good or bad but rather they behave differently.
I'd like to know others opinion too in this case please. Thanks.
|
|
|
10-23-2017 9:08 AM
|
|
MacCauley
Contributes Regularly
Joined:
Oct 2017
Sex: Male
Posts:
354
Reputation: 361
Rep Post
|
RE: AM NOS 2017 Reviews
11-03-2017 6:44 AM
Okay, so I took a huge leap of faith and ordered a bottle of AM NOS.
I went through 4 bottles of AM back when it was gold, and half of bottle after they changed the formula. The current edition is nowhere near the old stuff, but it's not a scam or a bad product. It's less intense, lacks the power it once had, brings moderate attraction hits compared to before. It's just not the same. I'd say releasing this new version is admitting your current stuff isn't as good.
I'll give my honest and unbiased review of AM NOS soon enough. Based on my history with the product, I'll be able to quickly assess it's power and how it is compared to the old AM. Thanks to showtime and V-nice for their reports. Based on their reports, AM NOS shows the symptoms of the real stuff.
Another point of interest, I wouldn't order from that discount site. It really goes by the saying "if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is". £20 for a bottle, nobody in their right mind would sell a bottle of old AM at that price. I tried a bottle and it was weak. It had the right scent and some mones in there, but it lacked that instant rush I always got before. My theory is that AD produced an inferior batch (it happens) and sold it on the cheap to the discount people.
|
|
|
11-03-2017 6:44 AM
|
|
Share This Thread