From the study:

"Studies of human attraction have demonstrated that men and women advertise heritable mate qualities such as body and face symmetry, masculine/feminine face shapes, body shape, body odour and vocal characteristics [82], [83], [84] and [85].

It was demonstrated that women prefer body odours collected from men with a high degree of bilateral symmetry compared with odours from asymmetrical men [86]. In turn, men and women indicated preferences for voices from individuals with higher degrees of bilateral body symmetry than lower bilateral symmetry [87]."

My point is: if I wear pheromones that only very simmetrical men should be producing (assuming that the reason why they are exceptionally simmetrical is linked to, or is the same biological reason why they "smell better"), woulnd't that be a visual/olfactory incongruence?

Or maybe my wearing pheromones induces women to "see" (unconcious process of course) me as more symmetrical than I am in strictly visual terms, and the same goes for the hearing of my voice? That would mean that the nº 1 and maybe the ONLY factor that matters in sexual/social preferences is the scent, and the other traits that the whole world believes to be relevant are totally smell-dependent.

But then, how could it be explained that we do tend to like or dislike people only by visual input, as we know when we see a beautiful woman or an ugly one on TV (body language and behaviour included).